In Tehran, specter of war met with more defiance than fear

In Tehran, specter of war met with more defiance than fear

In Tehran, specter of war met with more defiance than fear

Many Iranians — desperate for relief from financial dire straits partly caused by US sanctions — are reacting with defiance rather than antagonism as the countries hurtle towards confrontation.

Many people here believe that Iran’s enemies — namely the US and its Gulf allies, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia — have long been on a warpath. Though US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said that the US does not want war, some believe the US administration’s diplomatic and economic campaign against the country is taking things to a fever pitch.

A year ago, US President Donald Trump withdrew from the landmark nuclear deal and imposed on Iran some of the most stringent sanctions in the country’s history.

Foreign companies exited the country in droves, the Iranian riyal nose-dived and prices soared.

“I am not afraid of war as I have already seen war,” said motor courier Majid Haqiqi, 57, referring to the country’s eight-year conflict with neighbor Iraq in the 1980. “I believe that America is not eager to attack Iran and only tries to terrify us.”

Haqiqi instead suggests a solution that many in Tehran would consider controversial. “The only way out of this situation is having dialogue. What is wrong with having the US here?” said Haqiqi. “(The US) can start businesses in Iran and use our workforce. If they take a step towards us, we also can take one step.”

Last week, Trump made several overtures to Tehran, asking the government to call him. He even contacted the Swiss last week to leave a phone number for Tehran to reach him, according to a diplomatic source.

The move seemed out of sync with the hawkish stances of National Security Advisor John Bolton, who has talked tough, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo who has been trying to rally diplomatic support for the US campaign against Iran’s regime.

Dialogue between the two countries is anathema to Iran’s hardliners, including Khamenei. “Negotiations are like a poison as long as the US remains the same way it is. And with the current US government is additionally poisonous,” the Ayatollah said in a speech on Tuesday.

A general view of Tehran, Iran on March 11, 2019.

‘We have nothing to lose’

Many Iranians are concerned about everyday issues, however. “I don’t think of war when I must think of basic needs,” said Janati, a 70-year-old retired army officer. “Ordinary people in Iran do not think of the enemy or of Zionists. They just need a better life.”

“We have nothing to lose,” said 37-year-old Alireza Sahraiee. Sahraiee said he was an international businessman last year and a luxury car-owner. A year after the start of Trump’s sanctions, he is a cashier at a shop.

“I believe we must revise our external affairs policy,” added Sahraiee. “We must let foreign investment come to us.”

Saba, a 19-year-old secondary school student, who declined to reveal her full name, said that, in the case of war, “I won’t leave Iran but will go to a remote area with my family and come back only when peace returns.”

Iran’s hardline politicians remain defiant, continuing to rail against Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and his reformer camp for forging the 2015 nuclear agreement. “We told you so,” is the prevailing message among Tehran’s conservatives.

They also believe that the US and its allies have too much to lose from a potential conflict. “We have a lot of capabilities,” said Hossein Kanani Moghadam, a former Commander of Iran’s elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

“Oil transit lines are very vulnerable in the Persian Gulf area … so we wouldn’t need to use advanced weapons.”

Iran may disrupt vital waterways for some of the world’s biggest oil supplies, such as the Strait of Hormuz, if a direct confrontation came to pass, the former commander said.

“I believe Trump is a poker player, playing with open cards. But our Supreme Leader is a chess player who is playing under the table,” said Moghadam. “It seems this is the battle of two wills. And it seems Trump’s will is more to scare the other side whereas we are not scared of Trump at all.”

But beyond the rhetoric and muscle flexing, Iran also has much at stake. “I think at this stage Iran really doesn’t want direct confrontation, neither with the US nor any other countries in the region,” said Aniseh Bassiri Tabrizi, senior research fellow at RUSI. “There has been a response but not a provocation so far from Iran and there has been a commitment to clarify that, if needed, Iran would respond with all its tools at its disposal.”

An Iranian woman walks past pictures of Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (top L) and of late Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini (top R), on October 13, 2017.

Proxy forces

Those tools consist of Iran-backed armed groups throughout the region.

In Yemen, Iran-backed Houthi rebels operate near the Red Sea’s Bab el-Mandeb strait, a vital route for oil supplies.

In Iraq, the formidable Popular Mobilization Units, an umbrella group of Iran-backed militias, could potentially be ordered to attack US positions in the country.

In Lebanon, the reach of Hezbollah’s seasoned fighters now spans two parts of Israel’s frontier, the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights in Syria, in addition to Lebanon’s border with Israel.

“We have seen in the past that Iran’s reliance on its proxies is probably the main tool at its disposal to deter a direct attack or avoid a direct confrontation,” said Tabrizi. “We are likely to see this as a main possibility and the main risk of confrontation — direct confrontation — between the US and Iran.”

Source link

nuno-show.nl

In Tehran, specter of war met with more defiance than fear

In Tehran, specter of war met with more defiance than fear

In Tehran, specter of war met with more defiance than fear

Many Iranians — desperate for relief from financial dire straits partly caused by US sanctions — are reacting with defiance rather than antagonism as the countries hurtle towards confrontation.

Many people here believe that Iran’s enemies — namely the US and its Gulf allies, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia — have long been on a warpath. Though US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said that the US does not want war, some believe the US administration’s diplomatic and economic campaign against the country is taking things to a fever pitch.

A year ago, US President Donald Trump withdrew from the landmark nuclear deal and imposed on Iran some of the most stringent sanctions in the country’s history.

Foreign companies exited the country in droves, the Iranian riyal nose-dived and prices soared.

“I am not afraid of war as I have already seen war,” said motor courier Majid Haqiqi, 57, referring to the country’s eight-year conflict with neighbor Iraq in the 1980. “I believe that America is not eager to attack Iran and only tries to terrify us.”

Haqiqi instead suggests a solution that many in Tehran would consider controversial. “The only way out of this situation is having dialogue. What is wrong with having the US here?” said Haqiqi. “(The US) can start businesses in Iran and use our workforce. If they take a step towards us, we also can take one step.”

Last week, Trump made several overtures to Tehran, asking the government to call him. He even contacted the Swiss last week to leave a phone number for Tehran to reach him, according to a diplomatic source.

The move seemed out of sync with the hawkish stances of National Security Advisor John Bolton, who has talked tough, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo who has been trying to rally diplomatic support for the US campaign against Iran’s regime.

Dialogue between the two countries is anathema to Iran’s hardliners, including Khamenei. “Negotiations are like a poison as long as the US remains the same way it is. And with the current US government is additionally poisonous,” the Ayatollah said in a speech on Tuesday.

A general view of Tehran, Iran on March 11, 2019.

‘We have nothing to lose’

Many Iranians are concerned about everyday issues, however. “I don’t think of war when I must think of basic needs,” said Janati, a 70-year-old retired army officer. “Ordinary people in Iran do not think of the enemy or of Zionists. They just need a better life.”

“We have nothing to lose,” said 37-year-old Alireza Sahraiee. Sahraiee said he was an international businessman last year and a luxury car-owner. A year after the start of Trump’s sanctions, he is a cashier at a shop.

“I believe we must revise our external affairs policy,” added Sahraiee. “We must let foreign investment come to us.”

Saba, a 19-year-old secondary school student, who declined to reveal her full name, said that, in the case of war, “I won’t leave Iran but will go to a remote area with my family and come back only when peace returns.”

Iran’s hardline politicians remain defiant, continuing to rail against Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and his reformer camp for forging the 2015 nuclear agreement. “We told you so,” is the prevailing message among Tehran’s conservatives.

They also believe that the US and its allies have too much to lose from a potential conflict. “We have a lot of capabilities,” said Hossein Kanani Moghadam, a former Commander of Iran’s elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

“Oil transit lines are very vulnerable in the Persian Gulf area … so we wouldn’t need to use advanced weapons.”

Iran may disrupt vital waterways for some of the world’s biggest oil supplies, such as the Strait of Hormuz, if a direct confrontation came to pass, the former commander said.

“I believe Trump is a poker player, playing with open cards. But our Supreme Leader is a chess player who is playing under the table,” said Moghadam. “It seems this is the battle of two wills. And it seems Trump’s will is more to scare the other side whereas we are not scared of Trump at all.”

But beyond the rhetoric and muscle flexing, Iran also has much at stake. “I think at this stage Iran really doesn’t want direct confrontation, neither with the US nor any other countries in the region,” said Aniseh Bassiri Tabrizi, senior research fellow at RUSI. “There has been a response but not a provocation so far from Iran and there has been a commitment to clarify that, if needed, Iran would respond with all its tools at its disposal.”

An Iranian woman walks past pictures of Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (top L) and of late Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini (top R), on October 13, 2017.

Proxy forces

Those tools consist of Iran-backed armed groups throughout the region.

In Yemen, Iran-backed Houthi rebels operate near the Red Sea’s Bab el-Mandeb strait, a vital route for oil supplies.

In Iraq, the formidable Popular Mobilization Units, an umbrella group of Iran-backed militias, could potentially be ordered to attack US positions in the country.

In Lebanon, the reach of Hezbollah’s seasoned fighters now spans two parts of Israel’s frontier, the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights in Syria, in addition to Lebanon’s border with Israel.

“We have seen in the past that Iran’s reliance on its proxies is probably the main tool at its disposal to deter a direct attack or avoid a direct confrontation,” said Tabrizi. “We are likely to see this as a main possibility and the main risk of confrontation — direct confrontation — between the US and Iran.”

Source link

nuno-show.nl

Alabama’s new abortion law has women ‘in fear for our lives,’ rape survivor says

Alabama’s new abortion law has women ‘in fear for our lives,’ rape survivor says

Alabama’s new abortion law has women ‘in fear for our lives,’ rape survivor says

Now she has a message for Alabama state lawmakers and Gov. Kay Ivey after they passed the most restrictive abortion law in the country — one that includes no exemptions for victims of incest or rape like herself.

“I have absolutely no words to describe the disgust that I feel and so many women have told me that they feel,” Blakely told CNN’s Alisyn Camerota on “New Day” Thursday morning.

“They’re scared. They’re angry,” she said. “We don’t know what’s going to happen. We are seriously in fear for our lives as women in Alabama.”

Blakely said the moment she was discovered she was pregnant with her rapist’s child was “the worst moment of my life.”

“I can recall being in the bathroom,” she said, “and biting on my shower curtain to keep from screaming so loudly because I was so distraught.”

That experience was incredibly traumatic, Blakely said. As a result, she suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder. If she had been unable to get an abortion and forced to carry her rapist’s child to term, Blakely said, “I can honestly say that I would not be here.”

Last week, she shared her experience with Alabama’s state legislature in the hopes lawmakers would not pass the bill, known as the Alabama Human Life Protection Act. Even if the law had been in place, Blakely told them. she would have found a way to have an abortion “somewhere, somehow,” because “there’s no way I would be able to carry my rapist’s child.”

“I want you all to know that as you are deciding on this,” she told them. “Please, I am begging you. Please don’t take away my choice.”

Women will continue to have ‘unsafe’ abortions, survivor says

Despite Blakely’s pleas, Alabama senators passed the legislation on Tuesday night, and Gov. Ivey signed it into law on Wednesday. The only exceptions in the bill are for women whose health is at risk as a result of the pregnancy, or if the “unborn child has a lethal anomaly.”

Democrats tried to reintroduce an amendment to exempt victims of rape and incest, but the motion failed.

Alabama Republicans have pushed the bill forward with the goal of getting it before the Supreme Court, where they hope the court’s conservative justices will overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, which legalized abortion in the US.

Blakely said she was disturbed that state lawmakers would be willing to put the safety and lives of women at risk in order to score political points.

Alabama says it wants to protect life. How does that claim stack up outside the womb?

“I think it is sick and cruel that they are willing to endanger the lives of literally millions of women for some sort of political pat on the back or something,” she said, “some sort of political advancement in their agendas.”

The new law will not stop women from having abortions, Blakely added. “Safe, legal abortion will end, but abortion will not end,” she said, adding that women will be forced to turn to unsafe abortion methods.

“That is something that I don’t know if the Republicans know or care about,” Blakely said. “But that is the fact of the matter — that we will continue to have them (abortions). They are taking away our safety.”

Source link

nuno-show.nl

error: Content is protected !!

This Area is Widget-Ready

You can place here any widget you want!

You can also display any layout saved in Divi Library.

Let’s try with contact form: